 |  |
 |  | |
| Reinventing the Venture
Capital Business
Complacency vs. Adjacency vs. Free Agency
There is a lot of talk these days about the need to reinvent the venture capital
model, and perhaps along with it many venture capital firms. Dave Strohm of Greylock
was quoted -sagely - saying, "Reinvention is a very hard thing." And
indeed it is. But while we all need to reassess
whether the way we've made money in the past will yield the same results in the
future, it seems a little overblown to throw out everything we've learned. This
is an argument about complacency vs. adjacency vs. free agency. Now,
no one wants to be accused of complacency. That has a pejorative connotation
right from the start. But while inertia can be a powerful force, it is not always
a bad force. Sometimes, inertia can keep you in place long enough to decide whether
you really do want to leap across that open crevasse. Sometimes, the difficulty
of reinvention can be a needed buffer against being a sucker for the transient
mood of the herd. It is indeed possible, perhaps
probable, that we all need to evolve in our thinking, our investing models, and
our investing targets. But, it is equally probable that the world as we knew it
did not simply vanish. Perhaps it just moved slightly out of our sight. Perhaps
it is just hibernating, awaiting the spring. So,
that brings us to adjacency. Most observers of successful businesses will
tell you that you should stick to your knitting. And failing that, only take up
needlepoint, not arc welding. All three can make something useful, but the first
two have a whole lot more in common. It makes a lot of sense as investors to look
for areas directly adjacent to where we have had success, if we do feel the need
for reinvention. For example, OVP saw some interesting
trends about five years ago, and took our historical expertise in IT and in Biotech
investing into the adjacent (or merged) locale of Digital Biology. It had the
sizzle of biotech with the lower capital intensity of software. While there are
some clear differences and we can't yet pound the table and prove we were right
- all the signs are good. We found a very appropriate (for us) adjacency. What
is troubling about many of the conversations we hear today is the amount of free
agency that is being advocated. We see firms heading to green tech, clean
tech, later stage, roll up, India, China, you name it. Now, to be fair, this may
be a legitimate case of adjacency for some firms, if they have been at the edge
of those spaces, places and stages in their historical investing patterns. So,
the move is as logical for them as Digital Biology was for OVP. But for many others,
we see this as a bridge too far. Many VC firms
are branching out to these new areas not because they understand them, but actually
because they don't. The grass is greener simply because the grass under their
feet seems dormant at the moment |  |
Reinventing a venture capital firm is very difficult But
inertia is not always a bad thing Finding attractive,
adjacent spaces to invest in needs to be a core competency for VC funds
Free agency - choosing new investing
spaces and places without existing adjacent experience - is perilous |
| 
| | |
 |  | |
| Startup activity
in the Pacific Northwest An important part
of surveying the territory for us is tracking which technology companies are getting
funded in the Pacific Northwest. We want to make sure we anticipate emerging trends,
and see the vast majority of the projects that do get funded within our targeted
spaces. Over the last two years, it appears we have.
Looking specifically at 2006, there were 45 investing rounds done in startups
in OVP's targeted spaces in Washington, and 15 in Oregon. This is right on the
historical 3-1 ration between our two primary markets. While Enterprise Security
and Software firms are strong throughout the Pacific Northwest, the other
top spaces differ markedly between Washington and Oregon. Washington's
Top 3 Washington sees the combination
of Biotechnology, Digital Biology and Health Care as its largest investment
sector - rising to 28% of their total deals done in 2006. Over the last two years,
Digital Biology accounted for ten financing rounds, with OVP leading a full 50%
of those transactions. Security and Enterprise
Software is the second largest sector, with 18% of the funded deals in that
space. The Security sub-segment saw ten financing rounds in 2005-2006, with OVP
leading in 30% of those. Communications &
Networking represented 16% of investments during the two-year span, with Mobile
applications leading the way. Oregon's Top
3 Oregon looks to Security &
Enterprise Software for 28% of its newly funded startups in 2005-2006, with
OVP leading two of the 12 rounds closed. The lineage
of Intel drives the second highest investment area in Oregon, in the Semiconductor
space. OVP's investment in Octavian Scientific is the noted leader among
the seven deals done by all venture firms during the past two years. The
third most popular category is Internet Applications and Services, a consumer-facing
area where OVP has reduced interest - where six financing rounds were concluded. In
reviewing all the deals done in the Pacific Northwest, we were pleased that we
had indeed seen the overwhelming majority of those in our domain that ultimately
raised venture capital, while actually pulling the trigger ourselves on just over
10% of those projects. Time will tell if our tight
screen was also the right screen. |
| There has been
a long-term balance of about 3 venture-backed startups in Washington for every
1 in Oregon OVP led 50% of the Digital Biology
deals in Washington over the last 2 years The
Semiconductor sector is a major investing space in Oregon OVP
did about 10% of the venture-backed projects in our spaces, on our turf |
| 
| | |
 |  | |
| It is a very busy
time We usually devote this section to topics
we feel can help our portfolio companies, But recently, there is so much going
on at OVP, we felt it appropriate to spend a little electronic ink to keep you
up-to-date. At the top of the list, we are pleased
to anounce the final closing of OVP Venture Partners VII. We set out to
raise $200M, and stopped the fund raising at our self-imposed hard cap of $250M.
This is our largest fund ever. We thank both returning and new LPs for their confidence
in us. OVP has already made four investments out of the new fund, with another
pending. In addition, recently we were pleased to
announce the addition of a new General Partner and a new Venture Partner to the
firm, both in our Kirkland, WA office. Mark Ashida
joined OVP as a General Partner from Microsoft, where he served as General
Manager of the Windows Enterprise Networking business. He will focus on security,
networking and infrastructure investments. Mark's 25 years of experience includes
serving as COO at the digital rights management firm InterTrust, sold to Philips
for $450M, as well as a number of Valley startups. Carl
Weissman joined as a Venture Partner, focused on Digital Biology. Carl
will continue to serve his primary role as President & CEO of Accelerator
Corp., the entity OVP has backed with other venture funds to provide a boost to
early-stage startups in the Digital Biology arena. Prior to Accelerator, Carl
served as CEO of Centagenetix, which merged with Elixir Pharmaceuticals in 2003.
With these two experienced executives on board, we look forward
to fresh perspective and extended networks to help generate new investments and
guide existing ones. Looking ahead, we are already
gearing up for: - Annual OVP Technology Summit
in Seattle on May 6-7
- Annual Meeting
with Limited Partners on May 7-8
This
year's invitation-only OVP Technology Summit promises to break all records for
attendance, and for provocative discussion. There will be three focus topic areas: - Digital
Media, the Internet and the Consumer
- Digital
Biology and the Promise of Personalized, Predictive, Preventative Care
- Applied
Nanotechnology
The high-powered lineup
of speakers include: - Rob Glaser, Chairman
& CEO - RealNetworks
- Wade Davis,
SVP M&A - Viacom
- Steve Mitgang, SVP
Advertising Platforms - Yahoo!
- Joe Costello,
Chairman & CEO - Orb Networks
- Seth Shapiro,
Principal - New Amsterdam Media
- Dr. Leroy
Hood , President - Institute for Systems Biology
- Dr.
Walter Fontana, Professor - Harvard Med. School
- Dr.
Bill Goddard, Professor - Caltech
- Bill
Lloyd , CTO - Kodak
- Bob Gregg, EVP
- FEI
- Augie Sick, VP - Invitrogen
- Keynote:
Dr. Larry Smarr, Professor - UC San Diego, on "Livingin a World
of Nanobioinfotechnology."
It should
be a fascinating session! Sponsors of the OVP Technology
Summit include: Comerica Bank, Seed IP, and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich
& Rosati. |
| OVP
VII closed at our self-imposed hard cap of $250M
With
a new General Partner and new Venture Partner in Kirkland, OVP has bulked up The
Annual OVP Technology Summit boasts an exceptional cast of speakers and attendees |
| 
| | |
 |  | |
| Living the dream in Oregon
means living right on top of the center of Open Source development. Now, OVP has
found a way to capitalize on that presence. We recently financed Collaborative
Software Initiative, Inc., a firm headed by the former CEO of the Open Source
Development Lab. The firm (known around OVP as
CSI - Portland) will use a collaborative software development model to bring together
industry segment leaders to provide lower cost applications where the target software
is a core business process, but not part of anyone's competitive advantage. (Think:
compliance in financial services.) OVP did the
$1M seed round in Collaborative Software Initiative. Gerry Langeler has
joined the board of the company, backed up by John Hull. A full Series
A round is planned for 2H 2007. |
| The Open Source cluster in
Oregon has spawned a new startup A collaborative software
model can lower customer costs | | | | |
|
 |
|  |
| | |
| | | | | | This
message contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and
purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should
delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution
of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. | |
| | | |
| |  | |
| |