Northwest Passage Q4, 2006
Subject: Northwest Passage Q4, 2006
Send date: 2007-10-04 15:05:10
Issue #: 4
Content:
Q4, 2006
 

Carl Sagan Was Right...

There are billions and billions of "stars."

We're not talking about stars in the literal sense, but in the personal sense. The rapid advance of technology is making billions and billions of consumers "stars", and changing the world in the process.

Let's look back at the history of the telephone industry.
In the early 1900's, we had:

  • Party line phones & pay phones
  • Many users to one device
  • That device was fixed to a specific place
  • Users numbered in the single-digit millions

In the middle 1900's we evolved to:

  • Dedicated line home phones (one per home)
  • Now, one device for a few users
  • The device still was fixed in place
  • Tens of millions of users

In the late 1900's came:

  • Phones in every room in the house
  • Now, multiple fixed devices per person
  • Hundreds of millions of users

Today we have:

  • A phone in every pocket, or on every belt loop
  • Now, multiple devices and device types per person
  • The devices are fully mobile
  • Billions of users (and billions of stars!)

Now take that same model and think about video entertainment: From movie theaters in the early 1900's (many to one - fixed place - 1 "channel"), to TV's in mid 1900's (one to a few - fixed - a few channels) to TV's in the late 1900's (more TV's per house than people - fixed - 100s of cable channels).

And now we wake up today with EV-DO, MySpace, YouTube and Orb Networks. Every phone is a TV; every person is a video entertainment channel. Billions and billions of stars.

The same model applies to shopping: From the general store, to the strip mall, to the mega mall, to Amazon, to eBay. Every person is a shopper, every person a storefront. Billions and billions of stars, again.

So what does it mean? It means the complete resetting of business models and business structures for established industries, of all shapes and sizes. Technology is driving the expectation of:

  • anything I want (information or products)
  • any time
  • anywhere
  • on any device I have
  • for "free"

VoIP and Skype have decimated long distance phone service. Free municipal Wi-Fi access is making "pay for" 802.11 services rapidly seem as antiquated as pay toilets. Open Source is hammering old enterprise software businesses and unleashing billions (well maybe hundreds of thousands) of programming "stars."

To those who believe that the great opportunities for venture capital investing are behind us, consider this: We are still early in the evolutions of these paradigm shifts. There are still billions and billions of stars to come. There are still billions of dollars to be made. Carl Sagan would be pleased.

 

 

 

 

 

If you can remember party line phones, you are reading this with glasses

 

 

 

 

As devices proliferate, users and usage models explode

 

 

 

 

The pattern of one to many, to one to one fixed, to many to one mobile - repeats

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The continuing fracturing of old business models and paradigms bodes well for startups, and venture capitalists

 

 

  
 

Making Sense of Sensors

We continually monitor developments in the Wireless space, looking for great investment opportunities. One of the remaining segments with the biggest market potential is at the lowest end of the data rate and power curves -- small, low-power, wireless sensors. Market research firm ON World estimated that wireless sensor networks generated less than $150 million in sales in 2003, but will top $7 billion by 2010. The revenue opportunity for just the semiconductor components of these tiny sensors will reach >$1billion by 2010.

The evolution of standards and lower prices are fueling the rapid growth of wireless sensor networks in a wide range of applications such as:

  • industrial controls
  • building automation
  • automatic meter reading
  • patient monitoring
  • homeland security

ZigBee is a new standard focused just on low-power, low-bandwidth wireless apps. There are >100 member companies in the ZigBee consortium and products are beginning to get traction in the marketplace. There also are a number of firms focused on leveraging the strong Wi-Fi momentum and existing infrastructure to develop low-power wireless sensor networks.

So which approach is best -- ZigBee, Wi-Fi or proprietary solutions? We've learned from extensive due diligence research on several start-ups that the answer varies depending on the end-user market segment.

  • ZigBee products are best for home automation and consumer products
  • Defense and other organizations doing extensive video monitoring may still require proprietary wireless solutions.
  • But for industrial and other commercial customers who have already invested a lot in their wireless networks, a solution that leverages their Wi-Fi investments is the best alternative.

Several potential customers told us that even though ZigBee sensors are very inexpensive, it is costly to build and support a second wireless network in their facilities. In addition, the ZigBee methods for providing security, reliability and robustness have not matured enough yet to meet enterprise and industrial requirements. It took >5 years for these key features to evolve for the Wi-Fi standard. There's nothing like talking with prospective customers to ensure that we're investing in the best alternative for an emerging market! We recently made our bet in the low power wireless space. See "Living The Dream" below for more details on Gainspan.

 

 

There is still a large un-tapped wireless market: sensor networks

 

 

 

 

 

 

The optimum solution depends on the application space

 

 

 

Industrial applications prefer Wi-Fi, to leverage their existing infrastructure

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
 

Planning for a successful 2007

This time of year, all our portfolio companies are wrapping up their calendar 2006 progress reports, and planning for 2007. As always, some have made plan in 2006 and are looking forward eagerly to the new year. Others are resetting expectations and budgets in the downward direction.

While every story is different, there are some common themes that differentiate those with green lights on our internal monitoring system, and those with yellow or red.

First and foremost, the portfolio companies that have executed closest to plan have (shockingly) been the most conservative in putting a plan on the table in the first place.

What? Is this a call for startups to back off their audacious growth plans? Yes, it is!

One of the most common failings we see are portfolio companies that consistently make plans that they then don't make. And when they miss target, all sorts of bad things start to happen.

Expenses end up leading revenues rather than lagging them. Cash disappears like hailstones on a summer evening. And perhaps most damaging, employees get the sense that not meeting plan is OK. "Gosh, we missed plan and the management team still has their jobs. So, it must be fine for us not to make plan, too." That cultural norm is deadly.

As investors and board members, we know that almost any growth plan for a startup has more risk in it than anyone can quantify. If the known risks don't get you, the unknown ones will. So, we strongly encourage our portfolio companies to "Make a plan that you can make!" If, over the course of the first quarter or half year it becomes apparent the firm can beat the plan - terrific. We'll relax the expense controls, hire more people, buy more equipment, whatever. We might even spring for bonuses!

For most of us, success is not measured by how much you grew, but how well you did versus plan. As long as you are growing nicely, it is the trend that matters more than the absolute value of the numbers.

So make a plan you can make, and 2007 will be a successful year.

 

The companies in our portfolio that are doing "the best" are the ones with the most "conservative" plans

 

 


 

 

 

Nothing is more dangerous than to create a culture where failure to execute is acceptable

 

 

Smart investors are ready to pour fuel on the fire, once you can demonstrate the fire is lit

  
 

Many years ago, OVP recognized the large strategic asset in our backyard in Oregon: Intel's huge Hillsboro operation. From our deep relationship with Intel comes yet another project, this one of the first investments out of OVP VII. Gainspan Corporation, (headquartered in Silicon Valley, with a significant development effort in India) has been spun off by Intel to give it the ability to attack the opportunity for low-power 802.11 applications.

OVP co-led the $10.5M Series A round, along with New Venture Partners and Sigma. John Hull has joined the Gainspan board for OVP, backed up by Dr. Rick LeFaivre.

OVP's strong connections to Intel continue to pay dividends

This is the first corporate-sponsored spin-out OVP has backed

   

 

 

 The OVP “Northwest Passage” is published four times per year. If you have comments or feedback on this newsletter or would like to unsubscribe, please send an mail to (unsubscribe@ovp.com) 
   
 This message contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. 
   
  

 

 

"Business is fun. You may not be able to laugh every day, but if you can't laugh most days - find another line of work."
- Gerry Langeler