 |  |
 |  | |
| Carl Sagan Was Right...
There
are billions and billions of "stars."
We're not talking about stars in the literal sense, but in the personal sense.
The rapid advance of technology is making billions and billions of consumers "stars",
and changing the world in the process. Let's
look back at the history of the telephone industry. In the early 1900's, we
had: - Party line phones & pay phones
- Many
users to one device
- That device was fixed to a specific place
- Users
numbered in the single-digit millions
In the
middle 1900's we evolved to: - Dedicated line
home phones (one per home)
- Now, one device for a few users
- The
device still was fixed in place
- Tens of millions of users
In
the late 1900's came: - Phones in every room
in the house
- Now, multiple fixed devices per person
- Hundreds of
millions of users
Today we have: - A
phone in every pocket, or on every belt loop
- Now, multiple devices and
device types per person
- The devices are fully mobile
- Billions
of users (and billions of stars!)
Now take that same model and think
about video entertainment: From movie theaters in the early 1900's (many to one
- fixed place - 1 "channel"), to TV's in mid 1900's (one to a few -
fixed - a few channels) to TV's in the late 1900's (more TV's per house than people
- fixed - 100s of cable channels). And now we wake up today with EV-DO,
MySpace, YouTube and Orb Networks. Every phone is a TV; every person is
a video entertainment channel. Billions and billions of stars. The same
model applies to shopping: From the general store, to the strip mall, to the mega
mall, to Amazon, to eBay. Every person is a shopper, every person a storefront.
Billions and billions of stars, again. So what does it mean? It means the
complete resetting of business models and business structures for established
industries, of all shapes and sizes. Technology is driving the expectation of: - anything
I want (information or products)
- any time
- anywhere
- on
any device I have
- for "free"
VoIP and Skype have
decimated long distance phone service. Free municipal Wi-Fi access is making "pay
for" 802.11 services rapidly seem as antiquated as pay toilets. Open Source
is hammering old enterprise software businesses and unleashing billions (well
maybe hundreds of thousands) of programming "stars." To those
who believe that the great opportunities for venture capital investing are behind
us, consider this: We are still early in the evolutions of these paradigm shifts.
There are still billions and billions of stars to come. There are still billions
of dollars to be made. Carl Sagan would be pleased. |  |
If you can remember party line phones, you
are reading this with glasses As devices proliferate,
users and usage models explode The pattern
of one to many, to one to one fixed, to many to one mobile - repeats The
continuing fracturing of old business models and paradigms bodes well for startups,
and venture capitalists | |

| | |
 |  | |
| Making Sense of Sensors
We continually monitor developments in the Wireless space, looking for great investment
opportunities. One of the remaining segments with the biggest market potential
is at the lowest end of the data rate and power curves -- small, low-power, wireless
sensors. Market research firm ON World estimated that wireless sensor networks
generated less than $150 million in sales in 2003, but will top $7 billion by
2010. The revenue opportunity for just the semiconductor components of these tiny
sensors will reach >$1billion by 2010. The
evolution of standards and lower prices are fueling the rapid growth of wireless
sensor networks in a wide range of applications such as: -
industrial controls
- building automation
- automatic meter reading
- patient
monitoring
- homeland security
ZigBee
is a new standard focused just on low-power, low-bandwidth wireless apps. There
are >100 member companies in the ZigBee consortium and products are beginning
to get traction in the marketplace. There also are a number of firms focused on
leveraging the strong Wi-Fi momentum and existing infrastructure to develop low-power
wireless sensor networks. So which approach is best
-- ZigBee, Wi-Fi or proprietary solutions? We've learned from extensive due diligence
research on several start-ups that the answer varies depending on the end-user
market segment. - ZigBee products are best
for home automation and consumer products
- Defense and other organizations
doing extensive video monitoring may still require proprietary wireless solutions.
- But
for industrial and other commercial customers who have already invested a lot
in their wireless networks, a solution that leverages their Wi-Fi investments
is the best alternative.
Several potential
customers told us that even though ZigBee sensors are very inexpensive, it is
costly to build and support a second wireless network in their facilities. In
addition, the ZigBee methods for providing security, reliability and robustness
have not matured enough yet to meet enterprise and industrial requirements. It
took >5 years for these key features to evolve for the Wi-Fi standard. There's
nothing like talking with prospective customers to ensure that we're investing
in the best alternative for an emerging market! We recently made our bet in the
low power wireless space. See "Living The Dream" below for more details on Gainspan. |
| There is still
a large un-tapped wireless market: sensor networks The
optimum solution depends on the application space Industrial
applications prefer Wi-Fi, to leverage their existing infrastructure |
| 
| | |
 |  | |
| Planning for a successful
2007 This time of year, all our portfolio
companies are wrapping up their calendar 2006 progress reports, and planning for
2007. As always, some have made plan in 2006 and are looking forward eagerly to
the new year. Others are resetting expectations and budgets in the downward direction. While
every story is different, there are some common themes that differentiate those
with green lights on our internal monitoring system, and those with yellow or
red. First and foremost, the portfolio companies
that have executed closest to plan have (shockingly) been the most conservative
in putting a plan on the table in the first place. What?
Is this a call for startups to back off their audacious growth plans? Yes, it
is! One of the most common failings we see are portfolio
companies that consistently make plans that they then don't make. And when they
miss target, all sorts of bad things start to happen. Expenses
end up leading revenues rather than lagging them. Cash disappears like hailstones
on a summer evening. And perhaps most damaging, employees get the sense that not
meeting plan is OK. "Gosh, we missed plan and the management team still has
their jobs. So, it must be fine for us not to make plan, too." That cultural
norm is deadly. As investors and board members,
we know that almost any growth plan for a startup has more risk in it than anyone
can quantify. If the known risks don't get you, the unknown ones will. So, we
strongly encourage our portfolio companies to "Make
a plan that you can make!" If, over the course of the first quarter or half year
it becomes apparent the firm can beat the plan - terrific. We'll relax the expense
controls, hire more people, buy more equipment, whatever. We might even spring
for bonuses! For most of us, success is not measured
by how much you grew, but how well you did versus plan. As long as you are growing
nicely, it is the trend that matters more than the absolute value of the numbers. So
make a plan you can make, and 2007 will be a successful year. |
| The companies in our
portfolio that are doing "the best" are the ones with the most "conservative"
plans
Nothing is more dangerous
than to create a culture where failure to execute is acceptable Smart
investors are ready to pour fuel on the fire, once you can demonstrate the fire
is lit | | 
| | |
 |  | |
| Many years ago, OVP recognized
the large strategic asset in our backyard in Oregon: Intel's huge Hillsboro operation.
From our deep relationship with Intel comes yet another project, this one of the
first investments out of OVP VII. Gainspan Corporation, (headquartered
in Silicon Valley, with a significant development effort in India) has been spun
off by Intel to give it the ability to attack the opportunity for low-power 802.11
applications. OVP co-led the $10.5M Series A round,
along with New Venture Partners and Sigma. John Hull has joined the Gainspan
board for OVP, backed up by Dr. Rick LeFaivre. |
| OVP's strong connections
to Intel continue to pay dividends This is the first corporate-sponsored
spin-out OVP has backed | | | | |
|
 |
|  |
| | |
| | | | | | This
message contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and
purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should
delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution
of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. | |
| | | |
| |  | |
| |